We're sorry, but this discussion has just been closed to further replies.
Not that this discussion really matters at all
the obvious answer is B, and what do you mean there is no expert terrain if it is base to summit? You have 2 advanced runs, 2 expert runs that have snowmaking, plus powder keg usually gets the man made snow from nitro ext with the wind and im sure the same will happen to bubblecuffer ext from gondi ext snow, plus you can ski every trail on the mountain since your at the summit.
there was a sign at the base of timberline last year that said "how many trails can you ski from the timberline lift?- All of them cause your going to the top baby!!"
SKIER iZ PrO said:Not that this discussion really matters at all
the obvious answer is B, and what do you mean there is no expert terrain if it is base to summit? You have 2 advanced runs, 2 expert runs that have snowmaking, plus powder keg usually gets the man made snow from nitro ext with the wind and im sure the same will happen to bubblecuffer ext from gondi ext snow, plus you can ski every trail on the mountain since your at the summit.
there was a sign at the base of timberline last year that said "how many trails can you ski from the timberline lift?- All of them cause your going to the top baby!!"
The obvious choice is A, to be honest. How many windholds a year do we see? A gondola from base-to-summit would not be a simple "put it up where it used to be" situation. There'd need to be a mid-station somewhere. The lift would probably need to run up around towards Bullwinkle's, and then get tacked around where Timberline is. Logistical nightmare.
In the meantime, you could wind up running a new quad from base to top of Spillway. This gives you 3 direct routes up to mid-mountain (Whiffletree, SuperQuad, and the new Spillway), which can be lapped, or you can continually go higher (from SQ or Spillway to Timberline, from Whiffletree or Spillway over towards King Pine). Less congestion in the middle of the mountain.
In theory, you'd also still be able to run one side of DRC and Spillway West; granted, it'd cause replacement of those current towers, among other things, but theoretically it'd be possible, giving as many options to get from A to B.
My logic has to do with the length of time it takes the summit to open and the lack of choices for non expert skiers at the summit.
One of the main reasons the Jackson Hole gondi can run at those wind speeds is because of wind direction. Most of the wind concerns at the Loaf come across the mountain, blowing chairs sideways...whereas at Jackson Hole, the majority of the wind comes straight through that hill. Big difference in being able to move things around. That's why in order to do a Gondi, they'd have to take it up from base to Bullwinkle's, and then up the Timberline line...to be honest, I think capacity and terrain wise, it's much better to go to top of Spillway. Lesser environmental impact in terms of cutting new lines, e.g. and probably would be cheaper, allowing Boyne to utilize more investments in snowmaking.i think your missing the part where there is a huge difference between an old gondola like sugarloaf once had and what a newer gondola is like. The gondola at jackson is capable of running in winds up to 80 miles per hour. Now ik the loaf gets windy but honestly if its blowing 80 plus its guna be tough for any lift anywhere to run.
© 2009 Created by Sugarloaf